51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ51EDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for credit referencing securitized products. Provides insights into financial market dispute resolution dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute characteristics in securitized financial products, focusing on credit referencing mechanisms and market interactions.
Methodology
Data collected through financial market surveys and regulatory reporting mechanisms.
Historical Context
Used by financial regulators to assess market stability and contract dispute trends.
Key Facts
- Tracks dispute characteristics in financial contracts
- Focuses on credit referencing products
- Provides market interaction insights
FAQs
Q: What are securitized products?
A: Financial assets bundled and sold as investment securities, typically including mortgages or loans.
Q: Why track contract disputes?
A: Helps assess market risk, transparency, and potential systemic financial challenges.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically quarterly, reflecting recent market dispute trends.
Q: What types of products are included?
A: Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS) are primary focus.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Financial regulators, investors, and risk management professionals analyze these trends.
Related Trends
20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ20ICNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ78FISNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ70A1ESNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ39FDSNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25A12MINR
36) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Nonfinancial Corporations Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ36RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Credit Referencing Securitized Products Disputes (OTCDQ51EDCNR), retrieved from FRED.