31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A22MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks institutional risk appetite and lending constraints in financial markets. Provides insight into risk management strategies of investment advisers.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in risk tolerance for separately managed accounts. Reflects institutional perspectives on investment risk and market conditions.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions and investment advisers.
Historical Context
Used to assess overall financial sector risk perception and lending environment.
Key Facts
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Reflects institutional risk tolerance
- Important indicator of financial market sentiment
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks institutional willingness to take financial risks in separately managed accounts.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Why is risk appetite important?
A: Indicates overall market confidence and potential investment trends.
Q: How do institutions assess risk?
A: Through comprehensive analysis of market conditions and institutional capabilities.
Q: Can this metric predict market changes?
A: Provides early signals of potential shifts in financial market sentiment.
Related Trends
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ78AISNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ75RBUNR
44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Equity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ44ADSNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79EISNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19B62MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ56A3TCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Risk Appetite Survey (CTQ31A22MINR), retrieved from FRED.