78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ78AISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bond lending. Provides critical insight into institutional lending dispute dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures the frequency and intensity of disputes in corporate bond lending transactions. It reflects market friction and operational challenges.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators to monitor lending market transparency and operational efficiency.
Key Facts
- Quarterly dispute volume metric
- Focuses on high-grade corporate bonds
- Indicates market operational challenges
FAQs
Q: What causes lending disputes?
A: Differences in valuation, collateral quality, or transaction terms can trigger disputes.
Q: How significant are these disputes?
A: They can indicate market stress and potential friction in securities lending.
Q: Why track high-grade corporate bond disputes?
A: These bonds represent a significant segment of institutional lending markets.
Q: How do regulators use this information?
A: To assess market transparency and potential systemic risks in lending.
Q: What are the data collection limitations?
A: Relies on self-reported institutional survey responses.
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39FDCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74A4ECNR
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ79ADSNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ21DDCNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ25B3MINR
20) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ20DCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ78AISNR), retrieved from FRED.