79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79EISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in lending dispute duration and persistence for non-agency RMBS. Provides insights into financial market complexity and risk assessment.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures shifts in collateral dispute characteristics for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Indicates potential market friction and lending challenges.
Methodology
Calculated through quarterly survey responses about dispute intensity and duration.
Historical Context
Critical for understanding financial market risk and lending environment dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates non-agency RMBS dispute trends
- Reflects lending market complexity
- Helps assess financial market friction
FAQs
Q: What does ALLQ79EISNR measure?
A: Tracks changes in duration and persistence of lending disputes for non-agency RMBS.
Q: Why are mortgage dispute trends important?
A: They reveal potential risks and friction in mortgage-backed securities markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Quarterly updates provide ongoing insights into lending dispute dynamics.
Q: What do increased disputes indicate?
A: May signal growing complexity or uncertainty in mortgage lending markets.
Q: Are there limitations to this data?
A: Represents survey perceptions and may not capture entire market complexity.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56A2TCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40DISNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ74B2ECNR
73) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the CMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ73RBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66B1ESNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ74A1RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Dispute Changes (ALLQ79EISNR), retrieved from FRED.