78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| C. Equities. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ78CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes for equity-based lending contracts. Provides critical insights into equity lending market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks dispute volume in equity lending collateral contracts. It helps assess financial market transaction complexity.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking equity lending dispute changes.
Historical Context
Used by investment professionals to understand equity lending market tensions.
Key Facts
- Monitors equity lending contract dispute trends
- Indicates potential equity market stress
- Quarterly survey-based measurement
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator track?
A: Measures volume changes in mark and collateral disputes for equity-based lending contracts.
Q: How often is this data refreshed?
A: Updated quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: Why are equity lending disputes significant?
A: They reveal potential friction in equity lending markets and broader financial system dynamics.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Investment analysts, risk managers, and financial regulators use this data.
Q: What are the data collection limitations?
A: Survey-based reporting may have inherent sampling and reporting variability.
Related Trends
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ07RBUNR
71) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of CMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ71DCNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ31A1MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19A7MINR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
ALLQ69MONR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74A2ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Equity Lending Disputes (SFQ78CICNR), retrieved from FRED.