68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency RMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ68ICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in demand for long-term funding for non-agency RMBS among institutional clients. Provides insights into institutional investment strategies.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks institutional demand for term funding in mortgage-backed securities. It reflects broader trends in financial market investment.
Methodology
Collected through surveys of financial institutions about their funding and investment activities.
Historical Context
Used by investors and policymakers to understand institutional investment trends.
Key Facts
- Reflects institutional investment appetite
- Indicates changes in long-term funding strategies
- Important for understanding market dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?
A: Indicates a significant rise in institutional demand for long-term funding in non-agency RMBS.
Q: Why is term funding demand important?
A: It reveals institutional investment strategies and confidence in mortgage-backed securities markets.
Q: How long are these term fundings?
A: The indicator specifically tracks fundings with maturities greater than 30 days.
Q: What type of institutions are surveyed?
A: Financial institutions involved in mortgage-backed securities trading and investment.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically gathered quarterly through comprehensive market surveys.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62B3ECNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39GDCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading REITs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ40CDCNR
41) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Nonprice Terms Incorporated in New or Renegotiated Otc Derivatives Master Agreements Put in Place with Your Institution's Client Changed?| D. Triggers and Covenants. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ41DRBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ19B43MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39DDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Term Funding Demand (SFQ68ICNR), retrieved from FRED.