39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ39GDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume for nonfinancial corporations. Provides insight into financial transaction complexity and corporate risk management.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute trends in financial transactions among nonfinancial corporations. It reflects potential friction in corporate financial interactions.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess corporate financial transaction health.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate financial transaction tensions
- Quarterly survey-based measurement
- Reflects potential financial interaction challenges
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks volume changes in mark and collateral disputes for nonfinancial corporations over three months.
Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?
A: They reveal potential friction and risk in corporate financial transactions and interactions.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: Collected quarterly through financial institution surveys.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and corporate risk management professionals.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes indicate?
A: Potentially smoother financial transactions and reduced inter-corporate friction.
Related Trends
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19A72MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37B33MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ74B1TCNR
77) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Consumer Abs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
ALLQ77TNNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31B32MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A52MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (CTQ39GDCNR), retrieved from FRED.