51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51FDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence. Provides insights into market friction and contractual complexity in commodity trading.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures shifts in dispute characteristics for commodity contracts over a three-month period. Helps assess market transaction efficiency and potential regulatory challenges.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and traders to understand commodity market transaction dynamics.
Key Facts
- Tracks three-month dispute changes
- Focuses on commodity contract interactions
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Measures changes in commodity contract dispute duration and persistence over three months.
Q: Why are commodity contract disputes important?
A: They reveal potential inefficiencies and transaction challenges in commodity markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on market participant surveys.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, traders, and market analysts use it to assess commodity market dynamics.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes indicate?
A: Suggests improving market efficiency and clearer contractual terms.
Related Trends
79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ79ERBUNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ39AICNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
ALLQ69TNNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19A72MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ62B1TCNR
67) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Non-Agency RMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ67RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Commodity Contract Disputes (OTCDQ51FDSNR), retrieved from FRED.