69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
ALLQ69TNNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures liquidity and functioning in the non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities market. Indicates significant market stress or deterioration.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks changes in market conditions for non-agency RMBS. It provides critical insights into mortgage market health.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions reporting market condition changes.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers to assess potential financial system risks.
Key Facts
- Tracks non-agency RMBS market conditions
- Indicates significant market deterioration
- Quarterly reporting of market functioning
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: What does 'deteriorated considerably' mean?
A: Suggests significant decline in market liquidity and trading conditions for these securities.
Q: Why is this indicator important?
A: It provides early warning signals about potential stress in mortgage and broader financial markets.
Q: How do market participants use this data?
A: Investors and analysts use it to assess risk and make investment decisions in mortgage securities.
Q: How frequently is the data updated?
A: The series is typically updated on a quarterly basis by financial reporting institutions.
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37B43MINR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ25A2MINR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39DDCNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ50DDSNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39FDSNR
76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ76ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market (ALLQ69TNNR), retrieved from FRED.