66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66A1ECNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in funding terms for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Provides critical insights into credit market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks funding availability and terms for non-agency RMBS. It reflects broader trends in credit markets and lending practices.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions about funding conditions.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers and investors to understand credit market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Tracks maximum funding for non-agency RMBS
- Indicates credit market flexibility
- Quarterly assessment of lending conditions
FAQs
Q: What does 'eased considerably' mean?
A: Indicates significant improvement in funding terms and credit availability for non-agency RMBS.
Q: Why are funding terms important?
A: They reflect overall market confidence and the ease of obtaining credit for mortgage-backed securities.
Q: How frequently are funding terms assessed?
A: Typically evaluated quarterly through comprehensive market surveys.
Q: Who monitors these funding terms?
A: Financial regulators, investors, and market analysts closely track these indicators.
Q: What impacts funding terms?
A: Economic conditions, interest rates, and overall market risk perception influence funding availability.
Related Trends
33) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ33RBUNR
55) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Grade Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
ALLQ55TNNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| C. Equities. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ78CICNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37B42MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40DDSNR
46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ46ADSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding Terms (ALLQ66A1ECNR), retrieved from FRED.