66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ66A1ECNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in maximum funding amounts for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Indicates potential expansion in lending market capacity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how maximum funding levels for non-agency RMBS have shifted over three-month periods. It reflects lending market flexibility.
Methodology
Collected through surveys of financial institutions reporting funding changes.
Historical Context
Critical for understanding mortgage market liquidity and credit expansion.
Key Facts
- Signals potential increase in mortgage lending capacity
- Reflects financial institution confidence
- Important for mortgage market analysis
FAQs
Q: What does 'Eased Considerably' indicate?
A: Suggests significant increase in maximum funding amounts for non-agency RMBS over three months.
Q: Why are funding terms important?
A: They reveal lending market flexibility and potential credit availability for mortgage investments.
Q: How might this impact borrowers?
A: Easier funding terms could potentially lead to more accessible mortgage credit.
Q: Who monitors these funding changes?
A: Investors, financial analysts, and regulatory bodies track these market indicators.
Q: What factors influence these changes?
A: Economic conditions, risk assessment, and institutional lending strategies affect funding terms.
Related Trends
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ31B32MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ74A2ESNR
63) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ63ISNR
24) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Insurance Companies Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
CTQ24ESNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 5. Diminished Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A52MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A32MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding Terms (SFQ66A1ECNR), retrieved from FRED.