51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ51CRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
14.00
Year-over-Year Change
-6.67%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically related to equity contracts. The metric provides insights into financial market stability and potential friction points in contract negotiations.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The trend measures the stability of equity contract disputes over a three-month period, reflecting potential challenges in financial transactions and market interactions. Economists use this data to assess the smoothness of financial contract settlements and potential systemic risks.
Methodology
Data is collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions and market participants tracking contract dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
This indicator is used by regulators and financial analysts to understand potential friction in equity markets and assess overall market efficiency.
Key Facts
- Tracks changes in equity contract dispute duration over three-month periods
- Provides insight into potential market friction and settlement challenges
- Helps assess overall financial market transaction smoothness
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically in equity contracts over a three-month period.
Q: Why are contract dispute metrics important?
A: These metrics help understand potential inefficiencies and friction points in financial markets, which can impact overall market performance and risk assessment.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically, this data is collected and reported on a quarterly basis, providing a snapshot of market conditions.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, economists, and market researchers use this data to assess market efficiency and potential systemic risks.
Q: What does 'Remained Basically Unchanged' mean?
A: This suggests that the duration and persistence of equity contract disputes have not significantly changed during the reported period.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ62B1RBUNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ56B2ESNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ56B4ESNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ56B3RBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37B4MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ37B1MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [OTCDQ51CRBUNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025