50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ50BRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
14.00
Year-over-Year Change
-12.50%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Monitors changes in mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts. Provides critical insights into financial market interactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks volume changes in disputes related to interest rate contracts. It helps understand market friction and potential systemic risks.
Methodology
Collected through survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volumes.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers to assess financial market stability and contract management.
Key Facts
- Tracks interest rate contract dispute volumes
- Indicates potential market tension points
- Important for financial risk assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: It tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for interest rate contracts over three months.
Q: Why are interest rate contract disputes important?
A: They can reveal potential stress in financial markets and contract management.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on financial institution surveys.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' indicate?
A: Suggests no significant shifts in dispute volumes during the reporting period.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ62B1ESNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ74A3ECNR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency RMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ68RBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ66A3ECNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ43ADSNR
46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ46BISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Interest Rate Contract Disputes (OTCDQ50BRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.