38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably

CTQ38ICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Measures significant increases in nonfinancial corporations' negotiation efforts for more favorable terms. Provides critical insights into corporate strategic positioning.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This indicator tracks substantial changes in corporate negotiation intensity across different business sectors. It reveals strategic corporate responses.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection capturing corporate negotiation intensity levels.

Historical Context

Economists use this to assess corporate strategic behaviors and market pressures.

Key Facts

  • Indicates significant corporate negotiation efforts
  • Reflects intense market competitive pressures
  • Provides strategic economic insights

FAQs

Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean in this context?

A: Indicates a substantial rise in corporate efforts to negotiate more favorable business terms.

Q: How frequently is this data collected?

A: Typically gathered quarterly through comprehensive corporate surveys.

Q: Why track corporate negotiation intensity?

A: To understand market dynamics and corporate strategic responses to economic conditions.

Q: What insights can be drawn from this metric?

A: Reveals corporate adaptability and potential market pressure indicators.

Q: Are there any data collection limitations?

A: Survey-based method may not capture all nuanced corporate negotiation strategies.

Related Trends

66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

SFQ66B1TSNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

ALLQ19B22MINR

52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ52B4ECNR

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

SFQ79FISNR

37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ37A62MINR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

SFQ74B1TSNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (CTQ38ICNR), retrieved from FRED.