26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ26DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures the reduction in negotiation intensity for insurance company terms. Provides insights into market dynamics and competitive pressures.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks changes in how aggressively insurance companies negotiate pricing and contract terms. Reflects market competitiveness and risk appetite.
Methodology
Surveyed through periodic assessments of insurance industry professionals.
Historical Context
Used to understand strategic shifts in insurance market negotiations.
Key Facts
- Indicates reduced negotiation efforts
- Reflects changing market conditions
- Provides insight into industry competitiveness
FAQs
Q: What causes decreased negotiation intensity?
A: Market stabilization, reduced competition, or changes in risk perception can lead to decreased negotiation efforts.
Q: How does this impact insurance pricing?
A: Reduced negotiation intensity might indicate more stable pricing or less competitive market conditions.
Q: Why track negotiation intensity?
A: It helps understand market dynamics, competitive landscape, and potential shifts in insurance strategies.
Q: Does decreased intensity mean less innovation?
A: Not necessarily. It could reflect market maturity or standardization of practices.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly to capture recent market trends and changes.
Related Trends
38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ38DSNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62B1ECNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ25B13MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ62B2TSNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19B72MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40AISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Insurance Negotiation Intensity (CTQ26DCNR), retrieved from FRED.