7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ07RBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
19.00
Year-over-Year Change
-17.39%
Date Range
7/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks hedge fund negotiation strategies and intensity in financial markets. Provides insight into institutional investment dynamics and market adaptation.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures changes in hedge fund negotiation approaches for pricing and terms. Reflects adaptive strategies in complex financial environments.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions and hedge fund managers.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to understand market negotiation trends.
Key Facts
- Indicates stability in negotiation approaches
- Reflects institutional investment strategies
- Provides market sentiment insights
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in hedge fund negotiation strategies over three-month periods. Provides insights into financial market dynamics.
Q: Why are hedge fund negotiation trends important?
A: Reveals market adaptability and institutional investment strategies. Helps understand financial sector responsiveness.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly based on survey responses from financial institutions.
Q: Can this indicator predict market changes?
A: Offers preliminary insights into potential market shifts and institutional investment behaviors.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: Relies on survey responses, which can have inherent reporting biases and subjective interpretations.
Related Trends
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31B63MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40BISNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ56A1TSNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ74B3ESNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ70B3ESNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ39BRBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Hedge Fund Negotiation Intensity (CTQ07RBUNR), retrieved from FRED.