78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78ADSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral dispute volumes for high-grade corporate bonds. Provides insight into financial market transaction complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks disputes in high-grade corporate bond transactions. It reflects potential friction in financial market interactions.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used to assess efficiency and challenges in corporate bond markets.
Key Facts
- Tracks high-grade corporate bond transaction disputes
- Indicates potential market transaction challenges
- Part of comprehensive market assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bonds. Reflects market transaction complexities.
Q: Why are bond transaction disputes important?
A: They can indicate potential inefficiencies or challenges in financial market interactions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically gathered quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: What insights can this provide?
A: Helps understand potential friction in corporate bond market transactions.
Q: What are the data's limitations?
A: Represents reported disputes and may not capture all market nuances.
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ39FICNR
77) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Consumer Abs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ77RBUNR
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading REITs Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ12TSNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency RMBS. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ78ERBUNR
67) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ67DCNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51DISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Market Questionnaire (ALLQ78ADSNR), retrieved from FRED.