72) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Cmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ72ISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
-66.67%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in term funding demand for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS). Indicates institutional investment appetite in real estate markets.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks client demand for long-term funding in commercial real estate. Provides insights into institutional lending trends.
Methodology
Surveys financial institutions about changes in CMBS funding requests.
Historical Context
Used to assess commercial real estate market liquidity and investment trends.
Key Facts
- Tracks long-term CMBS funding demand
- Indicates commercial real estate market health
- Measures institutional lending trends
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' indicate?
A: Suggests moderate growth in demand for commercial mortgage-backed securities funding.
Q: Why track CMBS funding demand?
A: Provides insights into commercial real estate market liquidity and investment trends.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Through quarterly surveys of financial institutions about their lending conditions.
Q: What impacts CMBS funding demand?
A: Interest rates, economic conditions, and real estate market performance influence demand.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Real estate investors, financial analysts, and economic policymakers monitor these trends.
Related Trends
5) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions, or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Hedge Funds Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ05TSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ51BRBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ40EICNR
26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ26RBUNR
32) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Investment Advisers to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms on Behalf of Separately Managed Accounts Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ32DSNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ22RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, CMBS Term Funding Demand (ALLQ72ISNR), retrieved from FRED.