67) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ67ISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in funding demand for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Provides insight into mortgage market liquidity and investor appetite.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks institutional perspectives on funding demand for non-agency RMBS. Indicates mortgage market investment trends.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions about RMBS funding.
Historical Context
Used by investors and policymakers to assess mortgage market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates non-agency RMBS funding trends
- Reflects mortgage market investment appetite
- Survey-based market indicator
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in funding demand for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Gathered through surveys of financial institutions about RMBS funding.
Q: Why are non-agency RMBS important?
A: Provides insights into mortgage market liquidity and investment trends.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial institution surveys.
Q: What do changes in this indicator suggest?
A: Reflects potential shifts in mortgage securities market and investor sentiment.
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ39ADCNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A12MINR
2) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Central Counterparties and Other Financial Utilities Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ02DSNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39DISNR
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading Reits Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ12ECNR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ42ADCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Funding (ALLQ67ISNR), retrieved from FRED.