51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ51CISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes specifically related to equity contracts over a three-month period. The trend provides insights into potential friction and complexity within financial market transactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The metric reflects the evolving landscape of contractual disputes in equity markets, potentially signaling underlying tensions or challenges in financial agreements. Economists use such indicators to assess market efficiency, contractual risk, and potential systemic pressures.
Methodology
Data is likely collected through surveys of financial institutions, legal professionals, and market participants tracking the characteristics of equity contract disputes.
Historical Context
This trend is used by regulators, financial analysts, and policymakers to understand potential risks and inefficiencies in equity market transactions.
Key Facts
- Indicates increased complexity in equity contract disputes
- Reflects potential market friction in financial transactions
- Provides insight into contractual risk and market dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does this trend measure?
A: It tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts over three months.
Q: Why are equity contract disputes important?
A: These disputes can signal potential inefficiencies, risks, or challenges in financial market transactions and contractual agreements.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: The data is typically gathered through surveys of financial institutions, legal professionals, and market participants tracking contract dispute characteristics.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, policymakers, and market researchers use this trend to assess market conditions and potential systemic risks.
Q: What are the limitations of this indicator?
A: The data represents a snapshot of a specific period and may not capture long-term trends or comprehensive market dynamics.
Related Trends
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ66A4RBUNR
47) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Commodity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ47AICNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Somewhat
SFQ69EONR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37B43MINR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency RMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ68DCNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ56A3TSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat [ALLQ51CISNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025