50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ50EICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
This economic trend measures changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes relating to credit referencing securitized products, including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS). It provides insight into market volatility and risk in the securitized products sector.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The Federal Reserve's 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?' survey tracks changes in dispute volume for various financial instrument types. The 'E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS' component is a key indicator of stress and uncertainty in the securitized products market.
Methodology
The data is collected through a quarterly survey of market participants.
Historical Context
This trend is used by policymakers and analysts to assess market conditions and risks in the securitized products industry.
Key Facts
- The trend measures dispute volume in securitized products.
- It provides insight into market volatility and risk.
- The data is collected through a quarterly Federal Reserve survey.
FAQs
Q: What does this economic trend measure?
A: This trend measures changes in the volume of mark and collateral disputes relating to credit referencing securitized products, including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS).
Q: Why is this trend relevant for users or analysts?
A: This trend provides insight into market volatility and risk in the securitized products sector, which is important for policymakers and analysts assessing conditions in this market.
Q: How is this data collected or calculated?
A: The data is collected through a quarterly survey of market participants conducted by the Federal Reserve.
Q: How is this trend used in economic policy?
A: This trend is used by policymakers and analysts to assess market conditions and risks in the securitized products industry, which can inform policy decisions.
Q: Are there update delays or limitations?
A: The data is released quarterly, so there may be a delay in the most recent information. Additionally, the survey's coverage may not capture all market activity.
Related Trends
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31A63MINR
36) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Nonfinancial Corporations Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
CTQ36TCNR
41) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Nonprice Terms Incorporated in New or Renegotiated OTC Derivatives Master Agreements Put in Place with Your Institution's Clients Changed?| D. Triggers and Covenants. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
OTCDQ41DESNR
26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ26ISNR
36) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Nonfinancial Corporations Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ36ECNR
7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ07RBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed? | E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably' (ALLQ50EICNR), retrieved from FRED.