40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40FISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for separately managed investment accounts. Provides financial market insights.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks dispute characteristics in investment adviser managed accounts. It reveals potential transactional complexities.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection tracking dispute characteristics in investment accounts.
Historical Context
Used by investment professionals to understand market interaction dynamics.
Key Facts
- Tracks dispute duration in investment accounts
- Measures changes in dispute persistence
- Reflects investment management transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in duration and persistence of disputes in separately managed investment accounts.
Q: Why are these dispute metrics significant?
A: They provide insights into potential challenges in investment account management and transactions.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Through periodic surveys of investment advisers tracking dispute characteristics.
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' suggest?
A: It indicates a modest rise in dispute duration or complexity compared to previous periods.
Q: Who finds this data useful?
A: Investment managers, financial analysts, and regulatory bodies use this information for market assessment.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ62A2TCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40DISNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37B42MINR
46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ46BDCNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19A63MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ37B4MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Investment Account Disputes (ALLQ40FISNR), retrieved from FRED.