40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40ADSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes with dealers and financial intermediaries. Offers insights into financial transaction complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how long and consistently financial disputes persist among dealers and intermediaries. It helps understand transactional friction in financial markets.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
Critical for understanding financial market efficiency and institutional interactions.
Key Facts
- Reveals financial transaction complexity
- Indicates potential market inefficiencies
- Helps assess institutional relationship dynamics
FAQs
Q: What do dispute duration changes mean?
A: Longer disputes can indicate increased complexity or disagreement in financial transactions.
Q: Why track dealer dispute persistence?
A: It provides insights into market friction and potential systemic financial challenges.
Q: How might these disputes impact markets?
A: Persistent disputes can slow transactions and potentially increase financial sector uncertainty.
Q: What factors influence dispute duration?
A: Market volatility, regulatory environment, and complexity of financial instruments play significant roles.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: Typically gathered quarterly to track ongoing trends in financial interactions.
Related Trends
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66B4RBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37A12MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ56B1RBUNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ70A1RBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19B1MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19A62MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ40ADSNR), retrieved from FRED.