39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
-75.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes volume with hedge funds. Provides insight into financial market friction and institutional risk management.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures shifts in dispute frequency between financial institutions and hedge fund clients. It indicates potential tensions in financial transactions.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and risk managers to assess financial market stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of dispute volumes
- Focuses specifically on hedge fund interactions
- Indicates potential market tension indicators
FAQs
Q: What does this metric measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with hedge fund clients over three months.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They can signal potential risks or friction in financial market transactions.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: Collected quarterly through financial institution surveys.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Regulators, risk managers, and financial analysts monitor these dispute trends.
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' indicate?
A: Suggests a moderate rise in dispute volumes compared to previous periods.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ56B1TCNR
23) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Insurance Companies as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ23TSNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ43AICNR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
OTCDQ42ARBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ66B1ESNR
77) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Consumer Abs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
ALLQ77MONR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ39BISNR), retrieved from FRED.