78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ78BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bond lending. Provides critical insights into financial market transaction complexities.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend measures dispute volumes in high-yield corporate bond lending transactions. It reflects market friction and operational challenges.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volume changes.
Historical Context
Used by risk managers and financial regulators to assess market transaction efficiency.
Key Facts
- Quarterly dispute volume metric
- Focuses on high-yield corporate bonds
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this series track?
A: Changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bond lending.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They indicate potential friction and risk in financial market transactions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The survey is conducted quarterly to capture market trends.
Q: Who uses this information?
A: Risk managers, regulators, and financial market analysts assess transaction dynamics.
Q: What are the data's limitations?
A: Survey-based data reflects institutional perceptions at a specific point in time.
Related Trends
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ22ICNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ78ARBUNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19A7MINR
47) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Commodity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ47ADSNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ52A2RBUNR
68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ68ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Bond Lending Disputes (SFQ78BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.