69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
SFQ69PNNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures improvements in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market liquidity. Provides critical insights into mortgage market functioning.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks changes in liquidity and market performance for non-agency RMBS. Reflects broader mortgage market health and investor sentiment.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial market participants tracking RMBS market conditions.
Historical Context
Used by investors and regulators to assess mortgage market stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly market liquidity assessment
- Focuses on non-agency residential mortgages
- Indicates investor confidence
FAQs
Q: What does this non-agency RMBS indicator measure?
A: It tracks improvements in liquidity and functioning of non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities markets.
Q: Why are non-agency RMBS important?
A: They represent mortgage securities not backed by government-sponsored enterprises, indicating private market health.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: The survey is conducted quarterly to provide current market insights.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Investors, mortgage professionals, and financial regulators monitor these trends.
Q: What does 'Improved Considerably' signify?
A: Indicates significant enhancement in market liquidity and trading conditions for non-agency RMBS.
Related Trends
73) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the CMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
SFQ73PNNR
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ50BDCNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31B33MINR
26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ26RBUNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78ADSNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ56A1ESNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market (SFQ69PNNR), retrieved from FRED.