Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted
CTQ25B6SINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
0.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 10/1/2011
Summary
Tracks quarterly survey respondent count for economic research. Provides critical insight into data collection and statistical sampling methodologies.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric represents the total number of participants in quarterly economic surveys. It helps researchers assess data reliability and representativeness.
Methodology
Calculated by counting unique survey participants in each quarterly reporting period.
Historical Context
Used by economists to validate statistical significance of research findings.
Key Facts
- Quarterly tracking of survey participation
- Critical for research statistical validity
- Indicates potential data collection trends
FAQs
Q: Why is the number of survey respondents important?
A: More respondents increase statistical reliability and reduce margin of error in economic research.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: The data is updated quarterly with the latest survey participation numbers.
Q: Can respondent numbers vary significantly?
A: Participation can fluctuate based on survey complexity and economic conditions.
Q: What impacts survey respondent counts?
A: Survey design, incentives, and economic climate can influence participation rates.
Q: How are low respondent numbers addressed?
A: Researchers may adjust methodologies or increase outreach to improve sample size.
Related Trends
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Somewhat
ALLQ69EONR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ51BICNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ66A1TSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51CDCNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Trs Referencing Non-Securities (Such as Bank Loans, Including, for Example, Commercial and Industrial Loans and Mortgage Whole Loans). | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51GDCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A62MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Respondents (CTQ25B6SINR), retrieved from FRED.