79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insights into lending market complexity and risk assessment.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute characteristics in high-yield corporate bond lending markets. It helps assess market friction and transaction challenges.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to understand corporate bond market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates lending market transaction complexity
- Reflects high-yield bond market tensions
- Signals potential risk assessment challenges
FAQs
Q: What do high-yield bond lending disputes indicate?
A: They reveal potential market friction and risk assessment challenges in corporate bond transactions.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They provide insights into market liquidity and potential lending constraints.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, investors, and financial analysts monitor these dispute metrics.
Q: What does an increase in disputes suggest?
A: Potentially increased market uncertainty or heightened risk perception.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ56A2ESNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ62B2TCNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ74B4RBUNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ74A4RBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40EDSNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| B. Etfs. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ21BDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ79BISNR), retrieved from FRED.