79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ79BDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insights into market friction and dispute resolution.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks how frequently and how long disputes occur in high-yield bond lending. It reflects market efficiency and operational challenges.
Methodology
Quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and market participants to assess lending market smoothness.
Key Facts
- Focuses on high-yield corporate bond lending
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Indicates market operational efficiency
FAQs
Q: What are mark and collateral disputes?
A: Disputes arise from disagreements about asset valuation or collateral terms in bond lending.
Q: Why track dispute duration?
A: Longer disputes indicate market inefficiencies and potential systemic risks.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: The survey captures quarterly changes in dispute characteristics.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes mean?
A: Fewer and shorter disputes suggest improved market processes and reduced friction.
Q: Who benefits from this information?
A: Regulators, bond traders, and risk managers use this to understand market dynamics.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ62A2RBUNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ25B43MINR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ70A4ECNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ22ISNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ70B2TCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40DISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Lending Dispute Characteristics (ALLQ79BDCNR), retrieved from FRED.