40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Trading Reits. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ40CDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes duration for trading REITs. Provides insights into financial transaction complexity and dispute resolution trends.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures the frequency and intensity of disputes in real estate investment trust trading transactions. Indicates potential market friction or resolution efficiency.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions reporting dispute changes.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to assess trading relationship stability.
Key Facts
- Tracks dispute changes in trading REITs
- Indicates transactional relationship dynamics
- Survey-based financial metric
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for trading REITs over three months.
Q: Why are these dispute metrics important?
A: They reveal potential friction or efficiency in financial transactions and trading relationships.
Q: How is the data collected?
A: Through surveys of financial institutions reporting dispute characteristics.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, investors, and financial analysts monitoring market transaction dynamics.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically reported quarterly with changes in dispute duration and persistence.
Related Trends
50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ50BISNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51BDSNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ06B2MINR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| B. Etfs. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ21BICNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ66A3TSNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19B62MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ40CDCNR), retrieved from FRED.